Prognostic performance of the 2023 FIGO staging schema for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic performance of the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) endometrial cancer staging schema. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database. Study population was 129,146 patients with stage I-IV endometrial cancer per the 2009 FIGO staging schema. Stage-shifting and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the 2023 FIGO staging schema. RESULTS: Upstage (IA → II, 21.4 %; IB → II, 53.0 %) and downstage (IIIA→IA3, 22.2 %) occurred in both early and advanced diseases. Inter-stage prognostic performance improved in the 2023 schema with widened 5-year OS rate difference between the earliest and highest stages (68.2 % to 76.9 %). Stage IA1-IIB and IIC had distinct 5-year OS rate differences (85.8-96.1 % vs 75.4 %). The 5-year OS rate of the 2009 stage IIIA disease was 63.9 %; this was greater segregated in the 2023 schema: 88.0 %, 62.4 %, and 55.7 % for IIIA→IA3, IIIA1, and IIIA2, respectively (inter-substage rate-difference, 32.3 %). This 5-year OS rate of stage IA3 disease was comparable to the 2023 stage IB-IIB diseases (88.0 % vs 85.8-89.5 %). In the 2023 stage IIIC schema (micrometastasis rates: 29.6 % in IIIC1 and 15.6 % in IIIC2), micrometastasis and macrometastasis had the distinct 3-year OS rates in both pelvic (IIIC1-i vs IIIC1-ii, 84.9 % vs 71.1 %; rate-difference 13.8 %) and para-aortic (IIIC2-i vs IIIC2-ii, 82.9 % vs 65.2 %; rate-difference 17.7 %) nodal metastasis cases. The 5-year OS rate of the 2009 stage IVB disease was 23.4 %; this was segregated to 25.4 % for stage IVB and 19.2 % for stage IVC in the 2023 staging schema (rate-difference, 6.2 %). CONCLUSION: The 2023 FIGO endometrial cancer staging schema is a major revision from the 2009 FIGO schema. Almost doubled enriched sub-stages based on detailed anatomical metastatic site and incorporation of histological information enable more robust prognostication.

Quality of care measurement for patients with ovarian cancer in Japan.

AIM: Quality of care is important to reduce disease progression, and improve both survival and quality of life. The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology has published treatment guidelines to promote standardized high-quality care for ovarian cancer in Japan. We developed quality indicators based on the guideline recommendations and used them on large datasets of health service use to examine the quality of ovarian cancer care. METHODS: A panel of experts developed the indicators using a modified Delphi method. Adherence to each indicator was evaluated using data from a hospital-based cancer registry of patients diagnosed in 2018. All patients receiving first-line treatment at participating facilities were included. The adherence rates were returned to participating hospitals, and reasons for nonadherence were collected. A total of 580 hospitals participated, and the study examined the care received by 6611 patients with ovarian cancer and 1879 with borderline tumors using 11 measurable quality indicators. RESULTS: The adherence rate ranged from 22.6% for "Estrogen replacement within 6 months of operation" to 93.5% for "Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for germ cell tumor more than Stage II." Of 580 hospitals, 184 submitted the reasons for nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of ovarian cancer care should be continuously assessed to encourage the use of best practices. These indicators may be a useful tool for this purpose.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital treatment volume affects survival in patients with endometrial cancer; notably, initial treatment at high-volume centers improves survival outcomes. Our study assessed the effect of hospital treatment volume on cost-effectiveness and survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was evaluated using the following variables and their impact on cost-effectiveness: 1) hospital treatment volume (low-, intermediate-, and high-volume centers) and 2) postoperative recurrent risk factors based on pathological findings (high- and intermediate-risk or low-risk). Data were obtained from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology database, systematic literature searches, and the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was used as a measure of effectiveness. The model was built from a public healthcare perspective and the impact of uncertainty was assessed using sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A base-case analysis showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at high-volume centers was below a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥5,000,000 with a maximum of ¥3,777,830/4.28 QALY for the high- and intermediate-risk group, and ¥2,316,695/4.57 QALY for the low-risk group. Treatment at the high-volume centers showed better efficiency and cost-effectiveness in both strategies compared to intermediate- or low-volume centers. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model outcome was robust to changes in input values. With the WTP threshold, treatment at high-volume centers remained cost-effective in at least 73.6% and 78.2% of iterations for high- and intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment at high-volume centers is the most cost-effective strategy for guiding treatment centralization in patients with endometrial cancer.

Intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: association for pathological factors and oncologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between intrauterine manipulator use and pathological factors and oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who had laparoscopic hysterectomy in Japan. METHODS: This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study of the tumor registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Study population was 3846 patients who had laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer from January 2015 to December 2017. An automated 1-to-1 propensity score matching with preoperative and intraoperative demographics was performed to assess postoperative pathological factors associated with the intrauterine manipulator. Survival outcomes were assessed by accounting for possible pathological mediators related to intrauterine manipulator use. RESULTS: Most patients had preoperative stage I disease (96.5%) and grade 1-2 endometrioid tumors (81.9%). During the study period, 1607 (41.8%) patients had intrauterine manipulator use and 2239 (58.2%) patients did not. In the matched cohort, the incidences of lymphovascular space invasion in the hysterectomy specimen were 17.8% in the intrauterine manipulator group and 13.3% in the non-manipulator group. Intrauterine manipulator use was associated with a 35% increased odds of lymphovascular space invasion (adjusted odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.69). The incidences of malignant cells identified in the pelvic peritoneal cytologic sample at hysterectomy were 10.8% for the intrauterine manipulator group and 6.4% for the non-manipulator group. Intrauterine manipulator use was associated with a 77% increased odds of malignant peritoneal cytology (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% Cl 1.29 to 2.31). The 5 year overall survival rates were 94.2% for the intrauterine manipulator group and 96.6% for the non-manipulator group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.64, 95% Cl 1.12 to 2.39). Possible pathological mediators accounted HR was 1.36 (95%Cl 0.93 to 2.00). CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis of predominantly early stage, low-grade endometrial cancer in Japan suggested that intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer may be associated with an increased risk of lymphovascular space invasion and malignant peritoneal cytology. Possible mediator effects of intrauterine manipulator use on survival warrant further investigation, especially with a prospective setting.

Uptake and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among US Patients With Less Common Epithelial Ovarian Carcinomas.

Importance: Randomized clinical trials examining the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer predominantly included patients with high-grade serous carcinomas. The use and outcomes of NACT in less common epithelial carcinomas are understudied. Objective: To investigate the uptake and survival outcomes in treatment with NACT for less common histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review with meta-analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2017 and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2006 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to April 2023. The evaluation included patients with stage III to IV ovarian cancer with clear cell, mucinous, or low-grade serous histologic subtypes who received multimodal treatment with surgery and chemotherapy. Exposures: Exposure assignment per the sequence of treatment: primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy (PDS group) or NACT followed by interval surgery (NACT group). Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends and characteristics of NACT use were assessed using multivariable analysis, and overall survival (OS) was assessed with the inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. Results: A total of 3880 patients were examined in the National Cancer Database including 1829 women (median age, 56 [IQR, 49-63] years) with clear cell, 1156 women (median age, 53 [IQR, 42-64] years) with low-grade serous, and 895 women (median age, 57 [IQR, 48-66] years) with mucinous carcinomas. NACT use increased in patients with clear cell (from 10.2% to 16.2%, 58.8% relative increase; P < .001 for trend) or low-grade serous (from 7.7% to 14.2%, 84.4% relative increase; P = .007 for trend) carcinoma during the study period. This association remained consistent in multivariable analysis. NACT use also increased, but nonsignificantly, in mucinous carcinomas (from 8.6% to 13.9%, 61.6% relative increase; P = .07 for trend). Across the 3 histologic subtypes, older age and stage IV disease were independently associated with NACT use. In a propensity score-weighted model, the NACT and PDS groups had comparable OS for clear cell (4-year rates, 31.4% vs 37.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.33) and mucinous (27.0% vs 26.7%; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68-1.19) carcinomas. For patients with low-grade serous carcinoma, NACT was associated with decreased OS compared with PDS (4-year rates, 56.4% vs 81.0%; HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.55-2.90). Increasing NACT use and histologic subtype-specific survival association were also found in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program cohort (n = 1447). A meta-analysis of 4 studies, including the current study, observed similar OS associations for clear cell (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.34; 2 studies), mucinous (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.71-1.21; 2 studies), and low-grade serous (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.63-2.74; 3 studies) carcinomas. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite the lack of data on outcomes of NACT among patients with less common carcinomas, this study noted that NACT use for advanced disease has gradually increased in the US. Primary chemotherapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian cancer may be associated with worse survival compared with PDS.

Effects of a fertility-sparing re-treatment for recurrent atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of progestin re-treatment for recurrent endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) and endometrial cancer (EC) following initial fertility-sparing treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Endometrial Cancer Committee. Multiple search engines, including PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database, were searched in December 2021 using the keywords "Endometrial neoplasms," "Endometrial hyperplasia," "Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia," "Fertility preservation," "Progestins," AND "Recurrence." Cases describing progestin re-treatment for recurrent EIN, AH and EC were compared with cases that underwent conventional hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were survival and disease recurrence, and the secondary outcome was pregnancy. RESULTS: After screening 238 studies, 32 with results for recurrent treatment were identified. These studies included 365 patients (270 received progestin re-treatment and 95 underwent hysterectomy). Most progestin re-treatment involved medroxyprogesterone acetate or megestrol acetate (94.5%). Complete remission (CR) following progestin re-treatment was achieved in 219 (81.1%) cases, with 3-, 6- and 9-month cumulative CR rates of 22.8%, 51.7% and 82.6%, respectively. Progestin re-treatment was associated with higher risk of disease recurrence than conventional hysterectomy was (odds ratio [OR]=6.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.99-23.10), and one patient (0.4%) died of disease. Fifty-one (14.0%) women became pregnant after recurrence, and progestin re-treatment demonstrated a possibility of pregnancy (OR=2.48; 95% CI=0.94-6.58). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that repeat progestin therapy is an effective option for women with recurrent EIN, AH and EC, who wish to retain their fertility.

Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Owing to the potential benefits of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer, the practice pattern has recently shifted in Japan. This study examined the trends in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective observational study examined the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tumor Registry database between 2015-2019. This study examined the time-specific proportion change and predictors of MIS use in initial endometrial cancer treatment in Japan, and compared it with the use of abdominal surgery. Additionally, the association between hospital surgical treatment volume and MIS use was examined. RESULTS: A total of 14,059 patients (26.5%) underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy, and 39,070 patients (73.5%) underwent abdominal hysterectomy in the study period. Patients who underwent MIS were more likely to be treated at high-volume centers, younger, central, or western Japan residents, registered in recent years, and had a tumor with stage I disease, type 1 histology, and less myometrial invasion (all adjusted p<0.05). The proportion of MIS treatments increased from 19.1% in 2015 to 34.3% in 2019 (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, treatment at high-volume centers was a contributing factor for MIS (adjusted odds ratio=3.85; 95% confidence interval=3.44-4.30). MIS at high-volume centers increased significantly from 24.8% to 41.0% (p<0.001) during the study period, whereas MIS at low-volume centers remained at median 8.8%. CONCLUSION: MIS has increased significantly in recent years, accounting for nearly 34% of surgical management of endometrial cancer in Japan. High-volume treatment centers take the lead in performing MIS.

ROS1 as a possible prognostic biomarker of cervical adenocarcinoma: An exploratory analysis with next-generation sequencing.

OBJECTIVES: Given the differences in clinical and biological characteristics between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, this study aimed to conduct an exploratory analysis to examine the molecular characteristics of cervical adenocarcinoma in a Japanese population. METHODS: This study explored the simultaneous testing of multiple mutations targeting cervical adenocarcinoma using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The following genes were analyzed: BCAR4, CD274, PDCD1LG2, KRAS, ARID1A, PTEN, ALK, EGFR, ROS1, BRAF, PIK3CA, EP300, EBXW7, SHCBP1, TGFBR2, SMAD4, ERBB2, ERBB3, and KLF5. Tumor tissue and blood samples were obtained at the time of primary treatment. The NGS-based molecular profiles obtained from Tokai University (49 specimens) were compared with the registered data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (133 specimens). RESULTS: The study cohort had higher rates of adenocarcinoma than the TCGA cohort (44.9% vs. 18.0%; P = 0.001). The adenocarcinomas in the study cohort had more alterations in ROS1, EGFR, EP300, SHCBP1, ALK, and PIK3CA than those in the TCGA cohort. Among them, ROS1 had the highest number of gene alterations (median, 7.00 ± 2.63). In the study cohort, patients with a high number of ROS1 alterations had a significantly higher recurrence rate (5-year recurrence rate, 48.8% vs. 14.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 4.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-15.50; P = 0.014) and lower overall survival than those with low alterations (5-year survival rate, 70.7% vs. 93.1%; HR, 7.15; 95% CI, 1.08-58.22; P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The current exploratory analysis suggests that ROS1 gene alteration may be a prognostic biomarker in cervical adenocarcinoma in Japanese patients.

Secondary ovarian cancer after external beam radiotherapy for nonovarian pelvic malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics and survival of patients who developed secondary ovarian cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for a prior nonovarian pelvic malignancy. METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study, querying the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result program from 1975 to 2016. 167,269 women who received EBRT for 7 malignancies (anus, rectum, bladder, cervix, uterus, vulva, or vagina) were examined to identify subsequent secondary ovarian cancer diagnosis after EBRT. Then, within the ovarian cancer cohort (n = 147,618), characteristics and survival of patients with secondary ovarian cancer after EBRT were compared to those with ovarian cancer who did not receive prior EBRT. RESULTS: Following EBRT for a pelvic malignancy, 215 (1.3 per 1000) patients developed secondary ovarian cancer. Among those, the most frequent prior malignancy was cervical cancer (45.6%), followed by rectal cancer (20.9%). The median time from prior EBRT to secondary ovarian cancer was 8.8 years (interquartile range, 2.8-14.5). In multivariable analysis, patients with secondary ovarian cancer after EBRT were more likely to be older, and have a recent year of diagnosis, but less likely to have early-disease compared to ovarian cancer patients without prior EBRT (all, P < 0.05). In weighted model, patients with secondary ovarian cancer after EBRT had decreased overall survival compared to those with ovarian cancer without prior EBRT (5-year rates, 19.6% versus 39.9%, hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.85). Similar association was observed in ages <70, ≥70, White, non-White, early-disease, and advanced-disease in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy-related secondary ovarian cancer may be associated with decreased overall survival.

Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2018 classification system for nodal-specific classifications for early-stage cervical cancer; specifically, to examine the impact of nodal metastasis on survival and the effect of postoperative treatments, according to histological subtypes. METHODS: This society-based retrospective observational study in Japan examined 16,539 women with the 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment from 2004 to 2015. Associations of cause-specific survival (CSS) with nodal metastasis and postoperative adjuvant therapy were examined according to histology type (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], n=10,315; and non-SCC, n=6,224). RESULTS: The nodal metastasis rate for SCC was higher than that for non-SCC (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the impact of nodal metastasis on CSS was greater for non-SCC tumors (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40-4.02) than for SCC tumors (adjusted-HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.70-2.84; p<0.001). Propensity score matching analysis showed significantly lower CSS rates for women with pelvic nodal metastasis from non-SCC tumors than from SCC tumors (5-year CSS rate, 75.4% vs. 90.3%, p<0.001). The CSS rates for women with nodal metastasis in SCC histology were similar between the postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups (89.2% vs. 86.1%, p=0.42), whereas those in non-SCC histology who received postoperative chemotherapy improved the CSS (74.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.043). CONCLUSION: The node-specific staging system in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer classification is applicable to both non-SCC tumors and SCC tumors; however, the prognostic significance of nodal metastases and efficacy of postoperative therapies vary according to histology.

Population incidence and characteristics of secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer: a competing risk analysis.

PURPOSE: To examine incidence and characteristics of women who developed secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer. METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 1973 to 2013. Women with uterine cancer who did not have synchronous or a history of breast cancer were followed after their uterine cancer diagnosis (N = 236,561). A time-dependent competing risk analysis was performed to examine cumulative incidences and clinico-pathological characteristics of those who subsequently developed breast cancer. RESULTS: There were 7110 (3.0%) women who developed secondary breast cancers after uterine cancer with 5-, 10-, and 20-year cumulative incidence rates of 1.5, 2.8, and 4.7%, respectively. The increase in the rate of secondary breast cancer was particularly high in the first 3 years after a uterine cancer diagnosis (annual percent change [APC] 4.9), followed by 3-7 years (APC 1.6) after diagnosis (P < 0.001). The median time to develop secondary breast cancer was 6.4 years. Older women had significantly shorter time intervals between uterine and breast cancer diagnoses (3.7 years for aged > 71, 5.9 for aged 64-71, 7.6 for aged 56-63, and 9.4 for aged < 56, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, older age, White race, married status, endometrioid, serous, and mixed histology types, and early-stage tumors remained as independent factors of developing secondary breast cancer (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tumor factors with endometrioid and serous histology types and early-stage disease were the factors associated with secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer diagnosis. Older women had shorter time to develop secondary breast cancer.

18F-FDG uptake in accessory respiratory muscles shows the respiratory effort of patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.

Patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) have severe breathlessness even with mild hypoxaemia. In patients with PPFE, accessory respiratory muscles, such as the sternocleidomastoid muscles, are used to maintain ventilation. An intense 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in accessory respiratory muscles using positron emission tomography/computed tomography reflects the strong respiratory effort of patients with PPFE.

A retrospective study for investigating the outcomes of endometrial cancer treated with radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the role of radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. METHODS: Data were analyzed for 39 247 patients with endometrial cancer registered with the Gynecologic Cancer Registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2004 to 2011. RESULTS: The rates of 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) in the radiotherapy and surgery groups were 53.6% and 94.5% in stage I or II, and 15.5% and 67.5% in stage III or IV, respectively. The prognosis in the radiotherapy group was significantly poorer than that in the surgery group. In multivariate analysis, age, advanced stage, histological type, risk of recurrence, and initial radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors. The rates of 5y-OS with no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy were 95.3%, 92.9%, and 87.1% for stage I or II, respectively, with significant differences among all groups (P < 0.001), and 60.0%, 70.4%, and 55.5% for stage III or IV, respectively, with significant differences of adjuvant chemotherapy with no adjuvant therapy (P < 0.001) and with adjuvant radiotherapy (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age, advanced stage, histological type, lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with radiotherapy had a significantly poorer prognosis and the appropriate indication of radiotherapy for endometrial cancer requires further study.

Association between hospital treatment volume and survival of women with gynecologic malignancy in Japan: a JSOG tumor registry-based data extraction study.

OBJECTIVE: Associations between hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes for women with 3 types of gynecologic malignancies, and the trends and contributing factors for high-volume centers were examined. METHODS: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology tumor registry databased retrospective study examined 206,845 women with 80,741, 73,647, and 52,457 of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumor, respectively, who underwent primary treatment in Japan between 2004 and 2015. Associations between the annual treatment volume and overall survival (OS) for each tumor type were examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with restricted cubic splines. Institutions were categorized into 3 groups (low-, moderate-, and high-volume centers) based on hazard risks. RESULTS: Hazard ratio (HR) for OS each the 3 tumors decreased with hospital treatment volume. The cut-off points of treatment volume were defined for high- (≥50, ≥51, and ≥27), moderate- (20-49, 20-50, and 17-26), and low-volume centers (≤19, ≤19, and ≤16) by cases/year for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, rare tumor histology, and initial surgical management as contributing factors for women at high-volume centers (all, p<0.001). The proportion of high-volume center treatments decreased, whereas low-volume center treatments increased (all p<0.001). Treatment at high-volume centers improved OS than that at other centers (adjusted HR [aHR]=0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.78-0.88; aHR=0.78, 95% CI=0.75-0.83; and aHR=0.90, 95% CI=0.86-0.95 for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors). CONCLUSION: Hospital treatment volume impacted survival outcomes. Treatments at high-volume centers conferred survival benefits for women with gynecologic malignancies. The proportion of treatments at high-volume centers have been decreasing recently.

Comparison of treatment outcomes of surgery and radiotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The study compared the treatment outcomes of surgery versus radiotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy, in stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients in Japan. METHODS: Of 57,470 patients diagnosed with stage I-IV cervical cancer from January 2001-December 2011, 1,932 patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma were initially treated by surgery or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS) in all and 614 propensity score-matched (PSM) patients (307 per group). We compared OS and prognosis factors based on age, primary stage, and treatment arm. RESULTS: In Japan, >80% (n=1,573) of stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients underwent surgery. The 5-year OS of surgery vs. radiotherapy groups were 82.1% (n=704) vs. 79.7% (n=59) (hazard ratio [HR]=1.494; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.826-2.702; p=0.181) for stage Ib2, 76.6% (n=239) vs. 66.7% (n=54) (HR=1.679; 95% CI=0.986-2.858; p=0.053) for stage IIa, and 71.1% (n=630) vs. 58.9% (n=246) (HR=1.711; 95% CI=1.341-2.184; p<0.001) for stage IIb. In 614 PSM patients balanced for age and carcinoma stage Ib2-IIb, the 5-year OS of surgery vs. radiation groups was 73.0% (n=307) vs. 65.5% (n=307) (HR=1.394; 95% CI=1.044-1.860; p=0.023). In multivariable analysis, age (HR=1.293; 95% CI=1.045-1.601; p=0.018), treatment arm, radiotherapy (HR=1.556; 95% CI=1.253-1.933; p<0.001), and stage IIb (HR=1.783; 95% CI=1.443-2.203; p=0.018) were independent prognosis factors for 5-year OS in stage Ib2-IIb adenocarcinoma patients. CONCLUSION: Age (>65 years), treatment arm (radiotherapy), and stage IIb significantly affect OS in cervical adenocarcinoma patients. Surgery may be considered for <65-year-old patients with stage IIb adenocarcinoma.

Intraoperative Rupture of the Ovarian Capsule in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of intraoperative ovarian capsule rupture on progression-free survival and overall survival in women who are undergoing surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus (Elsevier) were searched from inception until August 11, 2020. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: High-quality studies reporting survival outcomes comparing ovarian capsule rupture to no capsule rupture among patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent surgical management were abstracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and studies with scores of at least 7 points were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The data were extracted independently by multiple observers. Random-effects models were used to pool associations and to analyze the association between ovarian capsule rupture and oncologic outcomes. Seventeen studies met all the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Twelve thousand seven hundred fifty-six (62.6%) patients did not have capsule rupture and had disease confined to the ovary on final pathology; 5,532 (33.7%) patients had intraoperative capsule rupture of an otherwise early-stage ovarian cancer. Patients with intraoperative capsule rupture had worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.34-2.76, P<.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I2=41%, P=.07) when compared with those without capsule rupture. Pooled results from these studies showed a worse overall survival (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.15-1.91, P=.003), with moderate heterogeneity (I2=53%, P=.02) when compared with patients without intraoperative capsule rupture. This remained significant in a series of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality observational studies shows that intraoperative ovarian capsule rupture results in decreased progression-free survival and overall survival in women with early-stage ovarian cancer who are undergoing initial surgical management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021216561.

Intersection of DNA Repair Pathways and the Immune Landscape Identifies PD-L2 as a Prognostic Marker in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Targeting DNA repair and immune checkpoint pathways has been the focus of multiple clinical trials. In this study, we explore the association between DNA repair proteins, immune response markers, and clinical outcome in women with EOC. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analysis of TMA with 181 EOC samples was used to determine expression levels for DNA repair proteins (PARP, PTEN, p53, H2Ax, FANCD2, and ATM) and immune-markers (CD4, CD8, CD68, PD-L2, PD-L1, and FOXP3). Biomarker expression was correlated to clinical data. Prognostic discriminatory ability was assessed per the combination of biomarkers. RESULTS: Tumor immunity biomarkers correlated with HRD biomarkers. High PD-L2 was significantly associated with high expression of CD8 (r = 0.18), CD68 (r = 0.17), and FOXp3 (r = 0.16) (all, p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, PD-L2 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.89), PARP (HR 1.75), and PTEN (HR 1.96) expressions were independently associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS), whereas PD-L1 (HR 0.49) and CD4 (HR 0.67) were associated with improved PFS (all, p < 0.05). In 15 biomarker combinations, six combinations exhibited a discriminatory ability of >20% for the 4.5-year PFS rate, with four based on PD-L2 (PARP, PTEN, CD4, and PD-L1, 20.5-30.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Increased PD-L2 expression is a prognostic marker of decreased survival in EOC. Interaction between tumor DNA repair and microenvironment determines tumor progression and survival.

The validity of the subsequent pregnancy index score for fertility-sparing trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate timing and a prediction model for pregnancy in early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent fertility-sparing trachelectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Academic multicenter. PATIENT(S): Women ages <45 years with clinical stage I-II cervical cancer were enrolled between 2009 and 2013 (n = 393). INTERVENTION(S): Planned fertility-sparing trachelectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative incidences and clinicopathological characteristics of those who developed subsequent pregnancy were examined. RESULT(S): There were 77 (21.6%) women who had subsequent pregnancies after fertility-sparing trachelectomy with 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative pregnancy rates of 2.8%, 6.2%, and 17.4%, respectively. The median time to develop subsequent pregnancy was 3.2 years. In a competing risk analysis, women had a higher risk of recurrent cancer than conception during the first 11 months postsurgery. On multivariable analysis, younger age, being married, and postoperative reproductive treatment were independently associated with an increased chance of developing a subsequent pregnancy. The subsequent pregnancy index (SPI) score to predict the likelihood of having pregnancy was proposed, and it was calculated based on age, marital status, and reproductive treatment (2, 2, and 4 points, respectively). Women with a higher SPI score had significantly higher subsequent pregnancy rates (5-year pregnancy rate; the score was 3 in 4.7% of cases; 4 to 5 in 11.3%; 6 to 7 in 27.4%; and 8 in 50.8%), but they had similar recurrence rates (5.0%). CONCLUSION(S): The SPI score proposed in our study is useful in predicting subsequent pregnancy in women with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing fertility-sparing trachelectomy.